"A pro and a con of dating me" Bumble Answers
The con has to cost the reader something real. "Pro: I will drive. Con: I will control the music" works because both halves are true and the second is a genuine minor inconvenience, not a disguised compliment.
This prompt is a test of whether you can be honest about a flaw without either apologising or humblebragging, and almost everybody fails it in the same direction. The con becomes "I care too much" and the whole answer collapses, because the reader now knows you will not admit to anything. Pick a real, small, survivable flaw and the pro barely matters.
Write mine freeNo signup, no card
What makes a good “A pro and a con of dating me” answer
The con is the whole answer
Readers skim the pro and judge you entirely on the con. Spend your effort there.
Small and real
A flaw that would genuinely mildly annoy a partner. Not a moral failing, not a fake one. The sweet spot is something a friend would confirm.
Let them connect
The best versions have a pro and con that are the same trait seen from two sides. That reads as self-knowledge rather than a list.
Both halves short
This prompt runs long more than any other. Two clauses, one line each at most.
“A pro and a con of dating me” answers by tone
Use them as they are, or as a shape to put your own detail into. The second option is always better: a copied answer stops working the moment someone asks about it.
Same trait, both sides
The strongest structure. One characteristic, honestly described twice.
- Pro: I will drive. Con: I will control the music.
- Pro: I plan everything. Con: I have already planned it and will be annoyed if we change it.
- Pro: I always know a place. Con: it is always the same place.
- Pro: I remember everything you tell me. Con: including the thing you wish I had not.
- Pro: I will cook. Con: the kitchen afterwards.
- Pro: very calm in a crisis. Con: unbothered by things you would like me to be bothered about.
Genuinely unflattering
Higher risk, much higher return. Only works if you are relaxed about it.
- Pro: low maintenance. Con: I will not notice you are upset unless you say so.
- Pro: I am on time. Con: I get visibly tense when other people are not.
- Pro: I will listen for hours. Con: I will then give unsolicited advice.
- Pro: honest. Con: honest at moments when it is not required.
- Pro: I can fix most things. Con: I will attempt to fix things that are fine.
Funny
Light, but the con still has to be an actual con.
- Pro: excellent snacks. Con: I have opinions about which snacks.
- Pro: I will get up early with you. Con: I will be extremely cheerful about it.
- Pro: great at parties. Con: I want to leave at half nine.
- Pro: I will help you move. Con: I will narrate the whole day.
- Pro: I read a lot. Con: I will tell you about it.
Warm
Sincere without becoming earnest. Works well when the rest of the profile is dry.
- Pro: I am easy to be around. Con: I am slow to say what I actually want.
- Pro: I will make the effort. Con: I will quietly notice if it is not returned.
- Pro: nothing is a fuss. Con: I will absorb a lot before mentioning it.
Short answers
For when the profile is already wordy elsewhere. Every one of these is under forty characters.
- Pro: I drive. Con: the music.
- Pro: I cook. Con: the kitchen.
- Pro: I plan. Con: I have planned.
- Pro: on time. Con: visibly.
- Pro: snacks. Con: opinions.
The same answer, rewritten
Instead of
Pro: I am funny. Con: I am too funny.
Try
Pro: great at parties. Con: I want to leave at half nine.
The first refuses to answer. The second is a genuine mild inconvenience that a lot of people will find relatable.
Instead of
Pro: I am organised. Con: maybe too organised.
Try
Pro: I plan everything. Con: I have already planned it and will be annoyed if we change it.
"Maybe too organised" is a compliment. The second version admits to being annoying, which is the point.
Instead of
Pro: good cook. Con: none really.
Try
Pro: I will cook. Con: the kitchen afterwards.
Three words that are specific, true and funny, and that anybody who has cooked with someone will immediately recognise.
Answers that do not work
“Pro: loyal. Con: I care too much.”
The classic humblebrag. It tells the reader you will not admit to a real flaw, which is itself a flaw.
“Pro: I am great. Con: you will get attached.”
Both halves are pros. It reads as bravado and gives nothing away, which defeats the entire prompt.
“Con: my ex says I am difficult.”
Brings an ex into the profile and outsources the judgement. Own the flaw or pick a different one.
“Con: I am a mess and terrible at relationships.”
Overshoots. A real flaw is charming, a warning is not, and this reads as the second.
How to write your own
Write the con first
It is the half that matters and the half that is hard. Once it is right, the pro takes ten seconds.
Choose something a friend would confirm
If a close friend would read the con and say "yes, accurate", it is the right one. If they would laugh at you for being modest, it is not.
Try making them one trait
Take the pro and ask what it costs someone. That answer is usually a better con than anything you would have picked separately.
Cut both halves in half
This prompt drifts long. Aim for two short clauses that fit on one line.
Write a “A pro and a con of dating me” answer
Nine questions about how you actually are, then an answer built from your details rather than from the list above. Every draft is checked against roughly 90 dating-app clichés before you see it.
Prefer to start from scratch? Open the full generator.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good "a pro and a con of dating me" answer?
One where the con is a real, small, survivable flaw. "Pro: I will drive. Con: I will control the music" works because both halves are true and the second is a genuine minor annoyance rather than a compliment wearing a disguise.
How honest should the con be?
Honest enough that a close friend would read it and agree. Not so honest that it reads as a warning. The target is something that would mildly irritate a partner, not something that would worry them.
Why does "I care too much" fail?
Because it is a pro pretending to be a con. Readers notice immediately, and what they take from it is that you would rather look good than be honest, which is worse than any real flaw you could have listed.
Is this the same as the "perks of dating me" prompt?
They are close relatives and the advice overlaps, but this one is harder and better. Perks of dating me only asks for the good half, so it invites bragging. Being required to name a con is what makes this version interesting.
How long should it be?
Two short clauses. Bumble allows more room than Hinge, but this prompt runs long more than any other and the best answers fit comfortably on a single line.
Can I generate one?
Yes, free and without an account. Pick Bumble, select this prompt, and RizzProfile writes a pro and a con from what you tell it, with the con weighted to be real rather than flattering.
More prompt answers
- “Worst idea I ever had”Pick a bad decision that cost you money, dignity or a weekend, and that ended fine.
- “My love language is”Do not name one of the five.
- “Give me travel tips for”Name a place you are genuinely about to visit, and add the specific thing you need help with.
- “My most controversial opinion”Pick something trivial that people genuinely argue about.
- “You should swipe right if”Describe yourself, not your requirements.
Or start from the bumble prompts hub.